Wilt Chamberlain,
1936-99: A Gentle Goliath The Big Dipper was basketball's nonpareil scorer and
rebounder, who might have been even better but for one flaw: He didn't possess a
mean streak
Seven feet, one and one-sixteenth inches tall was Wilton Norman
Chamberlain. No one, however, believed him. He once said to me,
"I could tell a little person, 'Oh, I'm 10'3",' and he would
answer, 'No, you're taller than that.'" To almost everyone he
encountered, Wilt appeared simply larger than life, a human
optical illusion. He loomed. It was as if he blocked out the sun.
Were
it only that. Were it only everyone else's perception. But
the
irony was that Wilt Chamberlain, who died of a heart attack
last
week at 63, was never quite big enough even for himself.
Especially
in his prime, he constantly felt compelled to do
more,
to be better, to go higher. For someone so curious and
sensitive,
he was too influenced--seduced, even--by his own
physical
preeminence. In a world where he knew he was the Most
Man,
he never would allow himself the legal dictum res ipsa
loquitur:
the thing speaks for itself. No, Wilt needed numbers
to
validate himself. If the most points were not enough, then he
would
get the most rebounds, then the most assists. Never take a
rest.
Never foul out. Alas, near the end, when he crowed of
having
had assignations with 20,000 women, that numbing
statistical
braggadocio made him a figure of fun. Always before
he
had been controversial, often even villainous, but never
foolish.
As
bad as his judgment was in that case, he didn't deserve
ridicule.
Wilt's other flaw, you see, was that he was a very
nice
and gentle man. His best friends called him Dippy, which is
hardly
a name we associate with ogres and giants. David and
Dippy?
I don't think so. Bill Russell even pointed out that if
Wilt
had possessed a mean streak, there would have been no
stopping
him. On the one occasion when Wilt was very angry at
me,
he delegated Jerry West to suggest that I depart from the
Los
Angeles Lakers' locker room; he couldn't bear such
confrontation
himself.
In
fact, I rarely recall that great deep voice rising in anger,
although,
coincidentally, the last time I saw Wilt, we fussed as
friends.
"Sometimes, my man, you take a right turn, and I just
don't
know where you are going!" he groaned, alluding to
something
I had written. By chance, someone snapped a shot of me
then,
pointing what appears to be a menacing finger at Wilt. I
look
at that photo now--Wilt in some outrageous Arabian Nights
outfit--and
I'm amazed at how surprised and cowed (well, he was
sitting
down) he is, reacting to my impolite gesture. It shames
me
because I know Wilt never would have acted so intemperately
toward
me or any other mere mortal. He was careful not to scare
the
little people. A little late, but: I apologize, my man.
This
night in question was last May, in Boston, where Russell
was
being celebrated. Wilt had flown across the country on his
own
hook, even though he knew that he was traveling 3,000 miles
just
to be the evening's appointed bad guy. No matter. He had
learned
to endure the cape of villainy slung round his shoulders.
Wilt
always recognized that the loss that hurt the most--and that
set
the precedent for his being perceived as a loser--was his
Kansas
team's triple-overtime defeat by North Carolina in the
1957
NCAA final (in which, in fact, he played valiantly).
Afterward,
he morosely walked the rainy streets of Kansas City,
and
when he left college after the next season, it would be
another
40 years before he returned to the campus. The shame he
inflicted
on himself for this defeat simmered for that long.
"That
goddamn one against Carolina," he would mutter. Worse, at
the
beginning of the game Tar Heels coach Frank McGuire had sent
out
his shortest starter, 5'10" Tommy Kearns, to jump center
against
Wilt--or, really, to call mocking attention to Wilt's
height.
Cruelly, it worked; it hurt him. Yet McGuire would become
Chamberlain's
coach with the Philadelphia Warriors in his
greatest
quantitative season--50.4 points a game, in 1961-62--and
Kearns
would become his friend and stockbroker. So there Wilt was
in
Boston for Russell, too, ready to take his public lumps to
help
honor his old friend and foe.
Oh
yes, the January before last Wilt finally went back to
Kansas,
where he put on his old letter jacket (which still fit
perfectly)
and watched as his jersey was raised above the court
at
Allen Fieldhouse. "I felt like I let the university down," he
told
the crowd.
"No,
no!" the Kansans cried back.
"Rock,
chalk, Jayhawk," Wilt said softly, and he cried.
There
was that sweet side the hugeness screened. For example,
for
all his masculine swagger and the sexual stats, Chamberlain
counted
many women among his friends and personally financed
women's
track and volleyball teams. He was a devotee of women's
tennis.
In a phrase almost Victorian, Wilt always decorously
referred
to his women as young ladies, even as he felt he had to
total
them up. He never married, and he told one of our mutual
friends
that only once, when he was playing in San Francisco in
the
mid-1960s, did he ever contemplate such a possibility. He
simply
didn't want to forgo his independence, and anyway, in an
overpopulated
world, he said, "I feel no need to raise any
little
Wilties."
Although
he always lived alone, Wilt never seemed to be a lonely
man.
He had learned to love Goliath. He was accessible. He
relished
a debate, adored travel and delighted in an eclectic
range
of the globe's roster of human beings. Indeed, it may be
most
revealing that, of all his basketball years, the one he
enjoyed
most was the one between leaving Kansas and joining the
NBA,
when he was a Harlem Globetrotter, globetrotting with no
pressure
on him to perform heroically, to quantify anything. I
always
thought that Chamberlain would have been much more
content
in an individual sport--such as track and field, in
which
he excelled, disparately, in the high jump and the shot
put.
The conflict between team and personal supremacy forever
confounded
him.
There's
no doubt that he could do, by himself, almost anything
he
ordained. I learned that myself, just as the centers he toyed
with
under the hoop did. In 1969 I wrote a cover story on
Chamberlain
for SPORTS ILLUSTRATED. He was 32 then, his great
scoring
days were behind him, and I ventured this memorable
line:
"There is a growing school of thought that he no longer
possesses
sufficient moves to make him a bona fide high-scoring
threat."
It had, in fact, been more than a year since he had
made
50 in any game. So: The very next game he played after the
magazine
came out, Wilt went for 60. Yet in the seventh game of
the
NBA Finals that year, Russell's swan song, the man who never
missed
a moment of any importance on the court took himself out
of
the game, sore-kneed, when the Lakers fell behind the Boston
Celtics.
Only when Los Angeles rallied without him did
Chamberlain
petition to go back in, but coach Butch van Breda
Kolff
refused. It cost van Breda Kolff his job. It cost Wilt
more,
his image.
His
defenders--and it almost defined what sort of a person you
were,
whether you fell into the Chamberlain or the Russell
camp--always
maintained that Chamberlain would have won as many
championships
as Russell did if he had been lucky enough to be
surrounded
by the deep Celtic green. "No," Bob Cousy said not
long
ago. "To play with Wilt you had to go down, set up and wait
for
him. We couldn't have played that way."
It
was not, really, that Chamberlain wasn't a team player.
That's
simplistic. In his great cathedral house in Los Angeles
he
kept not a single trophy attesting to his individual
achievements,
except for his Hall of Fame certificate. He gave
all
the others away. "They make other people happier," he told
me
matter-of-factly. Rather, I think, he was just so dominating
a
presence that he overwhelmed his own team. He was, ultimately,
primarily
an opposing force. Whereas players like Russell made
their
teammates better, it was Chamberlain's fate to bring out
the
best in the opposition. Finally he awoke one summer's
morning
on vacation on an island somewhere in the Adriatic and
understood
that. "There was always so much more pain to my
losing
than there ever was to gain by my winning," he explained.
It
was time to quit basketball.
The
rest of his life was much happier. He went barefoot and
could
play at being Wilt more than having to be him all the
time.
And if there is a heaven, my man, it's a place where
nobody
has to shoot free throws.
Copyright
1999 Time Inc.
Frank Deford, Wilt Chamberlain, 1936-99: A Gentle Goliath The Big Dipper was basketball's nonpareil scorer and rebounder, who might have been even better but for one flaw: He didn't possess a mean streak. , Sports Illustrated, 10-25-1999, pp 80+.
Copyright © 1999 Infonautics
Corporation. All rights reserved. - Terms
and Conditions